Doing a migration to SBS 2011 and I’ve had a few interesting issues. With this customer, SP1 for SBS 2003 was not installed. Interestingly, the other service packs were installed. Upon installing SBS SP1 I got the following error in the error log saying that the current user didn’t have the correct access. I was logged in with administrator (which you need to be logged in with to install SP1 for some odd reason).
Upon further investigation I found that the SBS user templates were disabled. I re-ran the SP1 wizard and it installed correctly.
If anyone is using Exchange 2010 and OWA with Update Rollup 2 installed, they might be having some issues.
One issue we came across, was that OWA was not being displayed after login. The current setup was Router<->TMG Server<->Exchange. As you can see, we have OWA published through Microsoft Threat Management Gateway (TMG) server.
What was happened, after the login screen, we were being presented with a blank page. Looking at the code of that page, you saw that not a lot was being returned. After some digging around (a lot of digging around), I found a page with some information on Update Rollup 2.
We decided to go a head and install Update Rollup 3. This can be found here. After installing this update, OWA now functioned, with a new problem. Images are not being displayed in OWA. All we get is a blank navigation menu.
After doing some research, the only fix I have found is by doing an reinstall of the CA role. This can be done by doing the following:
I recently built a new Windows 2008 R2 server. typical setup. Once everything was configured, I decided to do a Windows Update, as you do. I noticed that one of the updates was taking a long time. This was update KB974431. I stopped the update and rebooted the server, on reflection, probably the wrong thing to do
When the server rebooted I could no longer add roles or features. Any type of install package (standalone or windows update) failed. The following message is logged in Event Viewer:
After quite a bit of time looking through google, I came across a few pages that managed to solve the problem. It seems the problem is caused by an update failing and causing the install packages to become corrupt. I came across the following page, which had this comment:
just replace package_for_kb974431_rtm~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~126.96.36.199.mum file located at c:windowsservicingpackages with the same file from functional server. Or you can have this file from update. You can download it here http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974431/en-us/ and unpack it: Just rename Windows6.1-KB974431-x64.msu to Windows6.1-KB974431-x64.cab … open it, open Windows6.1-KB974431-x64.cab inside and there you will find package_for_kb974431_rtm~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~188.8.131.52.mum
you will also have to take ownership over old file and also you will have to set proper permissions on c:windowsservicingpackages folder – in order to rename old file and copy the new one
I had an interesting issue. I had an old Windows 2000 SBS server on my clients network. Been there for a long time as they needed to use the legacy application that it runs. Most services were disabled (ISA, Exchange). Problem arose as it had been disconnected from the domain for some time. This proved interesting when I tried to remove it from the domain. We had to do a adprep /forceremoval (undocumented).
Anyway, the next issue arose when the new Exchange 2010 server was being installed. We could not create mailboxes for exiting users. What gives? I thought Exchange was not being used on the old server? Seems it was, at one stage.
Ok, time to remove this.
[PS] C:Windowssystem32>get-mailbox LegacyUser
Name Alias ServerName ProhibitSendQuota —- —– ———- —————– Legacy User LegacyUser OldSBS2000 unlimited
Ok, the user still seems to be there. I managed to find a command which disables the mailbox AND removes the legacy information from Active Directory.
[PS] C:Windowssystem32>disable-mailbox LegacyUser
Confirm Are you sure you want to perform this action? Disabling Mailbox “LegacyUser” will remove the Exchange properties from the Windows user object and mark the mailbox in the database for removal. [Y] Yes [A] Yes to All [N] No [L] No to All [?] Help (default is “Y”):
If you don’t disable the user, you will get the following error:
[PS] C:Windowssystem32>remove-mailbox LegacyUser
Confirm Are you sure you want to perform this action? Removing the Mailbox “adeleg” will remove the Active Directory user object and mark the mailbox in the database for removal. [Y] Yes [A] Yes to All [N] No [L] No to All [?] Help (default is “Y”): Active Directory operation failed on LegacySBS2000.domain.local. This error is not retriable. Additional information: Acc ess is denied. Active directory response: 00000005: SecErr: DSID-03151D12, problem 4003 (INSUFF_ACCESS_RIGHTS), data 0 + CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (0:Int32) [Remove-Mailbox], ADOperationException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : 103F99DF,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RecipientTasks.RemoveMailbox
Now you can add mailboxes to these users.You can also remove this information from AD using ADSI Edit, but I STRONGLY DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS. It does work however 😉
Have you had the problem where Outlook sits there, forever, waiting to “update current folder”. I recently had this problem when changing an Outlook 2007 client to HTTP over RPC. After I made this change, weird stuff started to happen. No problem I thought. I will use scanpst.exe and attempt to scan the file. In the past, this has been where most of these sorts of problems lie. This was quite a large file, 3.5gb. After this had completed and still didn’t work, I started scratching my head a bit. What would cause this to happen?
After a bit of testing, I found that turning cached mode off let the folder update. I then proceeded to delete every file out of the Outlook folder (under local settingsapplication datamicrosoftoutlook) apart from the ost file and archive folders.
This fixed the problem. This is the first time I’ve come across this so I thought I’d share.
Microsoft have released a new operating system designed for the small business. Wait, don’t we already have one of those?
Microsoft Server 2008 Foundation is aimed at businesses with 15 employees or less. It’s an OEM product that only comes with new machines sold by either Dell or HP (at time of writing). Another thing to note are the artificial limitations placed on the OS.
15 users maximum
Limited to 8gb of memory
At the same time it does have one benefit. It’s a very cheap Terminal Server.
The OS is upgradable to other versions of server 2008, but what is the point? I can guarentee that by the time this happens, the hardware will be out of date, or the hardware simply won’t be able to be upgraded significantly to improve the performance of the server with the upgraded operating system.
The biggest problem with Foundation is its lack of Exchange. What business operates without email these days?
I love Microsoft products, but this sounds like a knee jerk reaction to a slow uptake on Windows 2008 Small Business Server and will ultimately fail. Watch this space…
Having issues with networking in a 2008 cluster? Could be Teredo.
Verifying that there are no duplicate IP addresses between any pair of nodes. Found duplicate IP address fe80::100:7f:fffe%13 on node node1.contoso.com adapter Local Area Connection* X and node node2.contoso.com adapter Local Area Connection* X.